Pairing Art with Buyers--CHF
Interviews Joyce Creiger
Joyce Creiger is an art-world polymath. As a leading art consultant, she's placed work in all kinds of environments, from commercial spaces and hospitality businesses, to healthcare facilities and government centers. A former gallery owner herself, Joyce currently owns an art-rental business, as well as an art-marketingcompany that's teaming up with a huge online retailer (more on this below). As if all of that were not enough, she also produces a local cable TV show in Boston and is an artist herself. In this Q&A with CHF Editorial Director Sofia Perez, Joyce talks about the changes she's witnessed over more than four decades in the industry, and describes the process of matching artwork to client.
You have worn many different professional hats in the art world. Give us a brief overview of your current work.
My art-consulting firm, Creiger Group Art Services, was one of the very first (if not the first) art-consulting firms in the country. We've been around for more than 45 years, so I've been doing this for a long time. A number of years ago, I formed a company called Boston Art Rentals. We own 3,000 works of art that we rent to stagers, corporations, and others. INFORMED About ten years ago, I started a marketing company called ArtSpecifier, a members-only website that accepts no more than 100 artists at any given time. We help promote their websites, through newsletters (usually two per month), and scrolling images on our site that feature ten different artists each week. We also have a blog and a Facebook page that go along with it. Most recently, ArtSpecifier has partnered with Wayfair's high-end division, called Perigold, which is just about a year old. It's geared toward high-net-worth individuals who have two homes, which are often in areas that don't have easy access to galleries. The company is hoping these folks will shop online, and we're going to be providing them with original works from our ArtSpecifier members. I also run a local cable TV show called Art Link, which features interviews with ArtSpecifier members and others, including architects, designers, and stagers--anybody that's involved in actually making or using art. Those interviews are featured on the ArtSpecifier website, as well as on our YouTube channel. Finally, I have my own studio and do a lot of commission work for clients. I've been doing that for what seems like a hundred years.
As an art consultant, you're kind of a matchmaker. Are your clients clear about the kind of art they like, or do you have to help them figure it out?
Let's take an example. Recently, we were approached by a development company that was taking down an escalator outside, in what was a very prominent space in Boston. They also needed artwork for four of their lobbies, so it involved tackling two different projects. For the lobby areas, we talked first about buying, but then they decided that they wanted to rent the art, so we gave them many different options. Eventually, they bought artwork for each of the different lobbies, and we helped them develop their budget, sourced the individual pieces, and installed them. Then we had to make recommendations for the exterior piece, which ended up being a metal sculpture by Shelley Perriott, who's an ArtSpecifier member. She developed an amazing piece that will sit on a pedestal in a plaza, lit from below. The client didn't have a huge budget--it was around $25,000, including the lighting. We've worked on projects as far away as Saudi Arabia, where we did a hospital. We had to work with the Saudi government, which meant dealing with their parameters about what they do and don't use in artworks. You can't have anything that is representational, so we had to be very careful. In fact, before we went on the trip, we went to a consultant to learn how I had to work in that country, particularly as a woman. So, each case is different. It's a lot of handholding, a lot of giving the client information, and then helping them make decisions.
If a potential client tells you they want a large scale bronze sculpture, for example, are you going out and looking for new artists, or only pulling from your ArtSpecifier member pool?
The former. In fact, Shelley was not a member
when we started working together. I'm always in
search of new artists. I'm cruising Facebook,
looking at Instagram and Linkedin, and
searching out in the world, at galleries. I am
looking for new artists every single day. When I
found Shelley's work, I fell in love with it, and we
developed a wonderful relationship, so she
decided to become a member.
ArtSpecifier is very different than most websites
where artists are promoted or where their work
is sold. We don't sell anything on there. That's
why I formed the relationship with Perigold
because it gives these artists a platform to sell
their work, whereas with ArtSpecifier, we just
market their work and coach them. I work with
them one on one if they need it. If they want help
putting together an RFP for a project, they call
me. That's different from most platforms--like
Fine Art America or any of the other websites.
Do you commission works, or are you looking for
pieces that are completed and that you've
already seen (in person or through social
media)?
All of the above. If an artist has an available
piece that works for a particular space, I would
definitely go there first. If they don't, and there's
a specific area where we're looking for a piece
and we can't find an existing one, then we might
commission it.
Recently, I worked on a hotel, and almost
everything in it is commissioned because it's
very unique to the specific location, and they
want artists from a specific area. I'm also doing
a senior-living project, which has some
commissioned art, and a lot of the work that I'm
sourcing is from what's already available.
We did the Luxor in Las Vegas. When they
came to us, they said, "We need artwork that
looks like it just got dug up from King Tut's
tomb." We had to do research with an
Egyptologist, but we created 40 objects that
were specific to what was dug up in King Tut's
tomb.
That's probably what's kept me in this business
for 45 years. Each project is new and exciting,
and it gives me a chance to be creative and
come up with solutions that I didn't have to
create for a prior project. It's constant stimulation
and the enjoyment of putting together something
unique.
When a client is commissioning something, it
sounds like communication is a big priority.
To ensure that there's never a problem, we
always do in-progress photographs. That way
the end-user gets to see things as they
progress. If the work is different from what they
had anticipated, we can catch that early on.
Everything is spelled out in the contract--the
size of the piece, the colors, where it's going to
go, what kind of lighting there is, what the base
is going to look like--and the client approves it
every step of the way. I have never done a
project where anybody has ever been unhappy
because I pay a lot of attention to detail. That's
critical.
As someone in the position of finding new work,
you really get an overhead view of the market.
What are some of the big trends you're seeing?
To answer that question, I have to give you a
little history. I've always thought of myself as a
bit of a visionary. I'm not the perfect
middleperson--I'm a great starter and a terrific
ender, which is why I've always had assistants
that I've trained who work with me on the middle
piece of it. I like the excitement of finding the
client, of bringing them the artist, and I love to
seal it up.
"The biggest mistake artists
make is trying to be all things to
all people."
I've come up with things that have failed in the
past. Back in 1985, I started the first interactive
laser-video-disk art catalog. This was before the
Internet. I took Sony's hardware--which was
used to train fighter pilots to fly planes on a
computer--and married it with the Library of
Congress' software. We developed a way of
finding information on a disk, and there were 12
galleries across the country that used our
standalone system. Artists could put their
images on the disk, and people could go on the
computer and say, "I want to find a painting of
an ocean in California under $10,000." Which is
what you can do today in a few keystrokes
online.
Ultimately, the business failed because it was
done with analog technology before digital
technology moved to the forefront, and my
investor pulled out. Although it failed, it was a big
learning experience for me. In 1990, I did the
first digital show in my gallery on Newbury
Street, where I was highly criticized by all of my
colleagues because I was showing work that
was created on a computer. People thought that
was a travesty. "How could you have a gallery
on Newbury Street, and not show paintings and
sculpture and original works of art?" But I had
people in the show like Jonathan Borofsky and
David Hockney. They were experimenting with
the computer and digital images. The show ran
for two months, and we showed 40 different
artists.
Today, I'm getting calls from people who want to
recreate that show because it was so pivotal.
What I'm saying is that when Perigold came to
me, I had colleagues who said, "Are you out of
your mind? You are going to go to a company
that advertises on TV and sells furniture, and
you're going to put original art there?" My
response? Wake up! The Internet is where
hundreds of millions of dollars worth of art is
being sold.
So to answer your question, I believe that the
Internet is going to be the game-changer for
artists. They have an opportunity. They can
have their own website and do their own
marketing to bring their work to the forefront--
gathering their own audience and their own
collectors. An artist who doesn't have a massive
online presence today and is just waiting for
their gallery to make a living is crazy.
Artists need more than one way to earn money
from their art.
Yes, I urge every artist to develop multiple
streams of income. I've never believed in
counting on one source. If you lose that one
client, you're screwed. You have to think about
how to generate money from sales of your
artwork, from licensing, from selling other things
on your website, and on and on. Maybe you're
promoting other artists--whatever it is. It's nice
when I get a check from ArtSpecifier, and
another check from the Creiger Group, and a
third check from the rental business. All of that
helps to support me and support what I do.
And artists shouldn't be afraid to do giclée prints
and hand-embellished giclées. You can do an
original piece that's beautiful, and sell it at topof-
the-line prices, but also have an ancillary
product line where you can make additional
money. A lot of my artists say to me, "I don't
want to do digital prints because it's going to
devalue my work." No, it's not. It's going to
increase the value of your original work. And it's
going to give you additional income, from being
able to sell something at a little bit lower price so
that you have a wider audience appreciating
your work.
What does an artist need to know before
approaching an art consultant like you?
I think the biggest mistake artists make is trying
to be all things to all people. It's very hard to do
that. You've got to run a business like others do.
No one does every aspect of it. They farm things
out, use interns, hire assistants. There's no
reason an artist has to spend time priming a
canvas. Anybody can do that. You get people to
help you so that you can maximize your time
and your talent.
If they want to run a business, they have to run it
like a business. Get an accountant or a
bookkeeper. Have a system for keeping track of
the artwork. And the single most important thing
they need to do is sign their work. Do you know
how many times I've gotten a phone call from an
auction house asking me, "Can you look at this
painting and tell me who did it?" There's no
signature on the front or the back, so how would
you know?
When you're creating your website, please put
your phone number on there. Nothing is more
frustrating for an art consultant or designer than
having to fill out a form and wait for a response.
They're working on a project, and want an
answer instantly. If they can't call the artist and
reach them, they get frustrated, and they often
don't bother to pursue it. It's that one on one that
matters. That designer has got a deadline. She's
got four projects going, and she's got to meet
her client tonight. She wants an answer. And if
she can't reach the artist, she'll move on to the
next one.
When you started ArtSpecifier, it was the first
online platform to link artists with designers and
consultants. How has that work evolved?
Right now, there are so many platforms that
flood the market. I keep it really small. I can
manage 100 artists, not 10,000. With the latter
number, you'd have to just throw them up there
and see what sticks. Artists need to be focused
on what they want to accomplish and go for a
platform that can help them achieve that.
I partnered with Perigold because I felt that the
artists on my site needed more. We were
marketing their work, but they needed the ability
to sell it, too. We were driving business to their
website but they didn't necessarily know where
that business was coming from, because there
was no direct link. We just put their name and
image out there, and anybody could find them
through Google. As a member of ArtSpecifier,
they now sign a contract with us, provide us with
a certificate of insurance so that there's a liability
policy, and then they can be added to Perigold,
where I can track their sales. Everything gets
shipped to me so that I can make sure it's in
good shape, and then Perigold picks up the
artwork from me and ships it to the client.
On ArtSpecifier, you not only connect people,
but you also present exhibitions and projects.
Tell us about how you foster a creative
community.
I will often meet with ArtSpecifier members, and
we'll bounce off different ideas. I had lunch with
one of my artist friends a couple of days ago,
and I've kind of nurtured him. He's a
photographer, and he's also been doing video
and portraits. When we talked, he told me that
what he really wants is for his fine-art
photography to be recognized. He wants to be in
a gallery and get more recognition for his work,
rather than just doing a one-off project.
I suggested that he drop some of the other
things and really focus on the fine-art
photography. Right now, he feels so much better
about his career than he has in the past. He
feels more satisfaction and sees more progress.
He's been getting accepted into exhibitions. So
it's that one-on-one consultation with them,
feeling out what they want in their gut and trying
to help them achieve that.
Ultimately, it's all about listening. If you sit down
and ask a question, and you listen to the answer
without injecting your thoughts or directing the
conversation, you get to hear what's really on
someone's mind. And when you can mirror that
back and tell them what they've just said, all of a
sudden it's an "a-ha moment."
Tell us about your art-rental business. Are you
renting out reproductions, originals, or both?
All of the above. I've been buying art since I was
16, and when I had my gallery, I always bought
one or two pieces from every show. That was
my commitment to the artist. So the 3,000 works
I rent out are a combination of pieces that I've
bought and work that I've traded for. Sometimes
an ArtSpecifier member will say to me, "Look, I
want to be on your site so badly, but I don't have
the money," so I offer to trade. "Let me pick a
piece of art and whatever the value is, I'll give
you that many years as a member."
"You shouldn't hold yourself up
as so exclusive that you'll only
show your art in a major gallery,
because galleries aren't doing
very much business anymore."
I also work with companies who have artwork
and want new art, but they don't know what to
do with the art they already have, so I say, "Give
that to me, and I'll credit you X amount of dollars
towards the new work." I've amassed this huge
inventory of everything from sculpture and
drawings, to prints and giclées. Other people
who were going out of business have called me
up to say, "You know I have 25 pieces. I'll give
them to you for $500," and I'd buy them.
Since I've acquired all of this art, it's just easy for
me to rent it. A client will call--a stager, for
example--and say, "Can you come on
Thursday? I'm staging a house, and I need
about 20 pieces for it." I charge them $35 a
month for each piece that's smaller than 40
inches. If it's larger, the price runs anywhere
from $50 to $100, depending on how big it is.
For me, it's not so much about the value of the
work as it is about how easy it is to handle it and
get it where it needs to go. If I have to include a
big piece, that means I have to rent a van so it's
going to cost them more money.
Because I only charge $35, I only use work I
own. (If I were to split that with an artist, it
wouldn't be worth it for either of us.) But if an
artist wants to rent their own artwork, they can
use that same formula.
There are also companies that do rentals and
that will put up a little plaque for the artist, to give
them some play. For artists, the advantage of
renting might be that they could ultimately get a
sale from it. We do often sell work from our
rental program to homeowners if, for example,
they are buying the home. They walk in and see
how beautiful the piece looks, and they'll call up
to say, "You had artwork in here, and now it's
gone, but we loved the pieces that were in the
living room and bedroom. Can we buy them?" Of
course, the answer is always yes. Why not?
An artist might even get a new commission from
the exposure of having their art in that space.
It certainly can't hurt. I'm a firm believer in
putting art where people will see it. I did a show
of my own artwork in Chico's--you know, the
store in the mall. I sold work from that. I believe
in getting it out there wherever you can. If a
restaurant wants you to put up your artwork, you
can make a sale. You never know.
Most recently, I was in a little coffee shop, and
there was artwork on display that I really liked. I
asked the owner whose artwork it was. His
reply? "It's my husband's." So I called up the
husband and after 20 minutes of conversation, I
ended up renting him my studio because I was
leaving that space to move to a new studio. He
never thought he needed a studio--he was
working out of his bedroom--and now he is the
happiest guy, because he has his own
workspace. And why? Because he hung his
artwork up in his husband's coffee shop. You
shouldn't hold yourself up as so exclusive that
you'll only show your art in a major gallery,
because galleries aren't doing very much
business anymore.
So much of your work is curation. How do you
differentiate what you do from the stream of art
content on Twitter and Instagram?
When I first started ArtSpecifier, I turned away at
least 30% of the artists who applied because I
held it to a very high standard. There needed to
be a lot of third-party validation, and I wanted to
make sure that their resumes were really good. I
was looking at credentials more than I was really
looking at the art--and I can tell you now that I
was wrong.
It was my assistant Cathy who called me on it.
"You're making a mistake," she said. When I
asked her what she meant, she replied, "That
piece of art is really pretty, and people would
love to buy it. Why are you not including it?" My
response was that there's nothing unique about
it; the artist hasn't done anything different than
anybody else. "Yes, but what she's done has
been done really well. It's really beautiful and
people will want that in their home." So I
relented.
Little by little, I found myself being less critical,
and trying to open myself up more to what the
public might want, as opposed to what an art
historian might feel was acceptable. That was
hard for me, because I come from the
background of being a curator, where I want to
see a unique use of the medium, and am looking
for art that I would've shown in my gallery. But
with the Internet, and a buying public as vast as
it is, I realized that I needed to appeal to a
broader audience, so I found myself accepting
more artists on ArtSpecifier. I felt that I had a
responsibility to show a broader spectrum of
work, so I went a bit more commercial.
Sounds like you're letting the market decide. If
someone wants to buy it, why not?
Exactly. And now with the partnership with
Perigold, I'm happy I did that, because they're
going to be looking for all kinds of work. I still
have people on ArtSpecifier who are doing very
unique things--we have one couple that's doing
amazing videos that belong in the Venice
Biennale--and next to it you might find a person
who does still lifes that the Bienniale would
never take, but it might end up in a museum
somewhere because it's beautifully done.
How does being an artist yourself--and one
who's run a gallery--shape what you're doing
today?
When you run a gallery, your obligation is to
your group of artists. You have to find them
work, and you're responsible for their income.
They've signed an exclusive with you, so you
have to make sure they make a living. If you're
an art consultant, it's very different. Your client--
the buyer--is your responsibility. It's the client
that hires you and expects you to bring them the
best of what's out there to meets their needs,
both artistically and budget-wise. Your
responsibility is very different in each case.
In running ArtSpecifier, I feel like I have two
responsibilities: 1) to bring the best artists I can
to the people who are coming to our site looking
for them, and 2) to feature the artists and give
them the best possible promotion.
I've always advocated for artists, whether I was
running a gallery, negotiating for a big-box store,
or putting their work on ArtSpecifier, because I'm
an artist at heart. I understand where they're
coming from.
About Sofia Perez
A journalist and writer/editor with more than 25
years of experience, Sofia Perez has written for
nearly every type of media and genre--from print
and web publications, to TV, nonprofit
advocacy, and fiction--and understands
firsthand how important it is for creative
professionals to learn basic business skills if they are to support their
artistic endeavors.
• CHF Responds to The New York Times - June
2, 2019
• The Key Role of Artists in Transforming Our
Communities--W.C. Richardson - May 6,
2019
• DC Area Artists Get Down to Business - April 5,
2019
• Pairing Art with Buyers--CHF Interviews Joyce
Creiger - April 12, 2019
• A Weekend of Art-Business Education and
Inspiration - March 26, 2019
• Creating and Disseminating Public Art
Internationally, in Real Time--CHF
Interviews Nina Colosi - March 25, 2019
• Tighten Your Sales Strategy and Refuse to
Compromise - March 20, 2019
• Determining Where You Belong in the Art
Industry--Donna Lee Nyzio - April 9, 2019
• The #1 Reason Artists Should Visit the DC
Area This Month - March 1, 2019
• CHF Gets South Florida Talking Art Business -
February 18, 2019